[subexp-daq] New warning meassage in R3BFUSER

[Håkan T Johansson]

Dear Günter,

thanks!  Yes, what I was looking for.

r3bfuser - same as new version  (so should not be at fault ;) )

Good news (to me) is that the nurdlib is in the same repo.

There are changes in sis3316-code in nurdlib between the working c36ae0a 
and non-working ccac28b which are beyond my understanding.  Unless urgent 
for you, I would suggest that we wait with that until Hans is back from 
vacation.  ;)

Meanwhile, if you like, you could of course start out at the working 
version combination, and update drasi and trloii to current version.  One 
at a time.  The interfaces between those and also those and nurdlib are 
small and should not have seen changes lately, so I would expect any such 
combinations to compile.

Cheers,
Håkan


On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:

> 
> Here are the hashes of the (old) software combination that runs without issues:
> 
> 
> (base) mbsdaq at atpnbg012:~/mbsrun/rio4/2024_mcalstruck/nurdlib$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
> c36ae0a
> 
> (base) mbsdaq at atpnbg012:~/mbsrun/rio4/2024_mcalstruck/trloii$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
> 0020559
> 
> (base) mbsdaq at atpnbg012:~/mbsrun/rio4/2024_mcalstruck/drasi$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
> 1c08b62
> 
> (base) mbsdaq at atpnbg012:~/mbsrun/rio4/2024_mcalstruck/r3bfuser$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
> d09918b
> 
> I hope this is what you were asking for.
> 
> 
> 
> Best greetings
> Günter
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Von: subexp-daq <subexp-daq-bounces at lists.chalmers.se> im Auftrag von Håkan T Johansson <f96hajo at chalmers.se>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2024 16:50:42
> An: Discuss use of Nurdlib, TRLO II, drasi and UCESB.
> Betreff: Re: [subexp-daq] New warning meassage in R3BFUSER  
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear Håkan,
> >
> >
> > we have to DAQ systems with identical hardware. Whenever, there is a new version (TRLOII,
> > NURDLIB, DRASI, etc.) from your side that we want to test, I am setting up one of them
> > with the most recent software version.
> >
> >
> > So, right now we have a running system that is roughly on the software status of two
> > months ago (if I remember corretly, this was after the repository change as we first had
> > to ask you to recreate the SIS3316 development branch) with some modifications from our
> > side to the SIS3316 code (committed about six weeks ago).
> 
> Just so I follow correctly: both systems are tested able to run with some
> (specific) software version?
> 
> Could you send the git hashes of nurdlib/r3bfuser/trloii/drasi of that
> working combination?
> 
> > And we have the 'new' system
> > that has identical hardware and the software status from last week. 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Håkan
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Best greetings
> >
> > Günter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________________________________
> > Von: subexp-daq <subexp-daq-bounces at lists.chalmers.se> im Auftrag von Håkan T Johansson
> > <f96hajo at chalmers.se>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2024 15:47:46
> > An: Discuss use of Nurdlib, TRLO II, drasi and UCESB.
> > Betreff: Re: [subexp-daq] New warning meassage in R3BFUSER  
> >
> > Dear Günter,
> >
> > did I follow this thread correctly that these tests are with 'new'
> > hardware, i.e. a setup which has no working reference software?
> >
> > You have / are using the SIS3316 modules in another physical setup with
> > some fairly recent branch in the previous nurdlib repository?
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/chalmers-subexp/nurdlib.prelgpl21/-/network/master
> >
> > --
> >
> > If so, there are three changes at the same time:
> >
> > - Nurdlib updates (also split by the repository change).
> >
> > - The SIS3316 code branch adapted from the previous to the new repository.
> >
> > - A new hardware setup.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Håkan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Dear Håkan,
> > >
> > >
> > > with diff = 1 the DAQ is running as long as only the VULOM4B is readout. Adding a
> > SIS3316
> > > module results in an readout error of that module, followed by a reset of the DAQ.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thus, I am currently unable to test SIS3316_check_hit_reworked_rebased. Sorry :-(
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best greetings
> > >
> > > Günter
> >
> >
> 
>