[subexp-daq] New warning meassage in R3BFUSER

[Håkan T Johansson]

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:

> 
> Dear Håkan,
> 
> 
> we have to DAQ systems with identical hardware. Whenever, there is a new version (TRLOII,
> NURDLIB, DRASI, etc.) from your side that we want to test, I am setting up one of them
> with the most recent software version.
> 
> 
> So, right now we have a running system that is roughly on the software status of two
> months ago (if I remember corretly, this was after the repository change as we first had
> to ask you to recreate the SIS3316 development branch) with some modifications from our
> side to the SIS3316 code (committed about six weeks ago).

Just so I follow correctly: both systems are tested able to run with some 
(specific) software version?

Could you send the git hashes of nurdlib/r3bfuser/trloii/drasi of that 
working combination?

> And we have the 'new' system
> that has identical hardware and the software status from last week. 


Cheers,
Håkan



> 
> 
> 
> Best greetings
> 
> Günter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________
> Von: subexp-daq <subexp-daq-bounces at lists.chalmers.se> im Auftrag von Håkan T Johansson
> <f96hajo at chalmers.se>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2024 15:47:46
> An: Discuss use of Nurdlib, TRLO II, drasi and UCESB.
> Betreff: Re: [subexp-daq] New warning meassage in R3BFUSER  
> 
> Dear Günter,
> 
> did I follow this thread correctly that these tests are with 'new'
> hardware, i.e. a setup which has no working reference software?
> 
> You have / are using the SIS3316 modules in another physical setup with
> some fairly recent branch in the previous nurdlib repository?
> 
> https://gitlab.com/chalmers-subexp/nurdlib.prelgpl21/-/network/master
> 
> --
> 
> If so, there are three changes at the same time:
> 
> - Nurdlib updates (also split by the repository change).
> 
> - The SIS3316 code branch adapted from the previous to the new repository.
> 
> - A new hardware setup.
> 
> Cheers,
> Håkan
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear Håkan,
> >
> >
> > with diff = 1 the DAQ is running as long as only the VULOM4B is readout. Adding a
> SIS3316
> > module results in an readout error of that module, followed by a reset of the DAQ.
> >
> >
> > Thus, I am currently unable to test SIS3316_check_hit_reworked_rebased. Sorry :-(
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best greetings
> >
> > Günter
> 
>