[subexp-daq] Question un UCESB compilation

[Håkan T Johansson]

Dear Günter,

the missing cernlib would not be an issue.

Though, this compile would not be needed, since UCESB should normally not 
be run o the RIO.  (The RIO has only one CPU-core, so running an unpacker 
there will take time from the DAQ.)

In fact, I think I never tried even to compile it on such slow systems :-)

Cheers,
Håkan



On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, Weber, Guenter Dr. wrote:

> 
> Dear friends,
> 
> 
> on the new system I get the following message when trying to compile UCESB:
> 
> 
> RIO4L-2 mbsdaq > make empty
> which: no cernlib in(/mbs/driv/white_rabbit/enigma/RIO4_Linux_OSV_2_6_33_SuHa/bin:/bin:/bin/ces:/usr/bin:/mbsusr/mbsdaq/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bi
> n/X11:/etc:/usr/etc:.:/mbsusr/mbsdaq/tools)
> which: no cernlib in(/mbs/driv/white_rabbit/enigma/RIO4_Linux_OSV_2_6_33_SuHa/bin:/bin:/bin/ces:/usr/bin:/mbsusr/mbsdaq/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bi
> n/X11:/etc:/usr/etc:.:/mbsusr/mbsdaq/tools)
> make[1]: Entering directory `/LynxOS/mbsusr/mbsdaq/daq/2024_polarimeter/ucesb/empty'
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/LynxOS/mbsusr/mbsdaq/daq/2024_polarimeter/ucesb/empty'
> 
> 
> On the PC there is no obvious problem, but on the RIO it looks like this. Is the missing cernlib an issue?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best greetings
> 
> Günter
> 
> 
> 
> 
>