[Agda] convertibility of implicit and explicit Pi-types

[Thorsten Altenkirch]

Why are implicit and explicit Pi-types not convertible?

eq : ({_ : Set} → Set) ≡ (Set → Set)
eq = {!refl!}

{_ : Set} → Set != Set → Set because one is an implicit function
type and the other is an explicit function type
when checking that the expression refl has type
({_ : Set} → Set) ≡ (Set → Set)



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chalmers.se/pipermail/agda/attachments/20200521/1ada52fc/attachment.html>