[Agda] Concepts within Type Theory – Re: [Coq-Club] Type Theory vs. Set Theory – Re: Why dependent type theory?

[Thorsten Altenkirch]

> There is only one mathematics, and it includes both non-constructive and constructive mathematics. You don't need to like both branches, in the same way that you don't need to like every branch of mathematics (and I am sure you don't). If you don't like one of them - and I have in mind Thorsten and Kevin, please keep quiet and do your own thing, instead of insisting that what you do is the ultimately good and correct and mainstream and accepted and blessed kind of mathematics. :-)

I agree and I don’t think I ever was selling constructive math as the ultimate good but I suggested that there should be some awareness of constructive issues among Mathematicians.

Thorsten 



> 
> Best,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Agda mailing list
> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.