[Agda] Defining the Delay monad as a HIT in cubical agda
Thorsten Altenkirch
Thorsten.Altenkirch at nottingham.ac.uk
Wed Apr 3 15:56:27 CEST 2019
I correct the statement:
The problem with the quotiented delay monad is that *I* cannot even
prove that it is a monad.
On 03/04/2019, 12:59, "Agda on behalf of Nils Anders Danielsson" <agda-bounces at lists.chalmers.se on behalf of nad at cse.gu.se> wrote:
On 02/04/2019 12.25, Thorsten Altenkirch wrote:
> The problem with the quotiented delay monad is that you cannot even
> prove that it is a monad.
Has this been proved now?
--
/NAD
_______________________________________________
Agda mailing list
Agda at lists.chalmers.se
https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment.
Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
where permitted by law.
More information about the Agda
mailing list