[Agda] type annotation in-place
Nils Anders Danielsson
nad at cse.gu.se
Thu Oct 8 15:48:44 CEST 2015
On 2015-10-08 09:39, Andrew Pitts wrote:
> Is Agda's "abstract" keyword documented/exlained anywhere?
Yes, but perhaps not on the wiki.
Once I wrote this:
The basic idea is that it should be possible to replace the
"right-hand sides" of abstract definitions with /anything/ that
type-checks, and this should not affect the type-checking of any
definition outside of the given "abstract block" in any way.
In practice abstract is mostly used to stop definitions from unfolding.
--
/NAD
More information about the Agda
mailing list