[Agda] modules named `_`

effectfully effectfully at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 22:07:19 CEST 2015


> My comment is about the semantics of the current syntax being unexpected

I actually like your version of the `_' behaviour, especially if

    _ : <Type>
    _ = <value>

were legal (@List, why is it not, BTW?). But "module _" says "I'm a
module, but ignore this", and it seems strange to spend such a nice
idiom on an almost pointless feature.


More information about the Agda mailing list