[Agda] Overloading atoms and operators

Nils Anders Danielsson nad at cse.gu.se
Tue Aug 18 12:17:18 CEST 2015


On 2015-07-24 11:15, Andreas Abel wrote:
> In the light of issue 1616, it seems sensible to rule out such
> overloading.
>
> An atom should be in name conflict with any operator containing this
> atom as a name part.

What do you mean by "be[ing] in name conflict"?

-- 
/NAD


More information about the Agda mailing list