[Agda] Mutual data definitions

[Andreas Abel]

Of course, the current error message is misleading.  Anyone want to 
drill around in Agda.Syntax.Concrete.Definitions to make it better?

--Andreas

On 27.01.2015 09:58, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> James,
>
> Thanks, I missed this subtlety in the docs!
>
> Dominique
>
> 2015-01-27 9:54 GMT+01:00 James Chapman <james at cs.ioc.ee>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You should omit the type in the 'definition' of B:
>>
>> data B : Set
>>
>> data A : Set where
>>    bA : B → A
>>
>> data B where
>>    aB : A → B
>>    b : B
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On Tue Jan 27 2015 at 10:50:47 AM Dominique Devriese
>> <dominique.devriese at cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell me if the following is supposed to work, or if I
>>> should use old-style mutual blocks for this?  Or maybe I've forgotten
>>> something else?  I currently get an error about a missing definition
>>> for B.
>>>
>>>    data B : Set
>>>
>>>    data A : Set where
>>>      bA : B → A
>>>
>>>    data B : Set where
>>>      aB : A → B
>>>      b : B
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dominique
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Agda mailing list
>>> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
>>> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Agda mailing list
>> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
>> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Agda mailing list
> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda
>


-- 
Andreas Abel  <><      Du bist der geliebte Mensch.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden

andreas.abel at gu.se
http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/