[Agda] tuple pattern sugar
Nils Anders Danielsson
nad at chalmers.se
Tue Jan 29 11:49:09 CET 2013
On 2013-01-28 19:38, Wolfram Kahl wrote:
> Would it work better to enforce:
> "((just x) : Maybe A) → …"
> , that is,
> (APAT : A) -> B
> where APAT is ``atomic pattern'' (variable, zero-ary constructor, parenthesised pattern)?
I think so, given that you remove "zero-ary constructor" from your list.
However, I'm not convinced that it is a good idea to make the syntax
more complicated in this way.
More information about the Agda