[Agda] Classical Mathematics for a Constructive World
Altenkirch Thorsten
psztxa at exmail.nottingham.ac.uk
Wed Nov 28 10:41:43 CET 2012
>Notnot appears to be a (crude?) form of "squashing", or "bracketing", or
>"smashing" constructions
>of a Sigma type down to "just one", or hiding all distinctions between
>them.
>It seems to have a quite dramatic effect on principles like CT,
>continuity, and even choice.
>Maybe there are other forms of squashing.
Indeed, there is the canonical _* : Set -> Prop which reflects Set into
Prop (can be also read as "inhabited"). It is equivalent to the quotient
with the "chaotic" equivalence relation (always true) under the priviso
that the by Set we mean hSet.
Hence we can express
Another alternative would be to use
WhCT: (Pi f : N->N)[(Sigma e : N)(Pi n : N)(Sigma m : N) T(e,n,m) and
f(n)=U(m)]*
which we could also write as
WhCT: (Pi f : N->N)[(Exists e : N)(Pi n : N)(Sigma m : N) T(e,n,m) and
f(n)=U(m)]
where Exists A P = (Sigma A P)*. How would this affect the results you
mention?
Thorsten
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
More information about the Agda
mailing list