[Agda] Agda Observational equality using primUnsafeTrustMe?
Conor McBride
conor at strictlypositive.org
Sun Jan 9 16:17:45 CET 2011
On 9 Jan 2011, at 14:44, Thorsten Altenkirch wrote:
> Ok, even if we only postulate ext : ((x: A) -> f x = g s) -> f = g
> and add an equality ext p = refl then p may be a lie but subst (ext
> p) reduces which can cause non-termination.
By the way, it is possible to construct a counterexample in the
manner you suggest, but in which p is not a lie.
Cheers
Conor
More information about the Agda
mailing list