[Agda] Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak
bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof)
Thorsten Altenkirch
txa at Cs.Nott.AC.UK
Tue Sep 1 15:59:39 CEST 2009
It is sound but useless.
T.
On 1 Sep 2009, at 14:49, Edsko de Vries wrote:
> Hmm, well, perhaps it's obvious to you, but it's not obvious to me
> that adding an inductive transitivity rule to an relation which is
> probably transitive is not sound..
>
> -E
> _______________________________________________
> Agda mailing list
> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
More information about the Agda
mailing list