[Agda] Re: [Coq-Club] Adding (inductive) transitivity to weak bisimilarity not sound? (was: Need help with coinductive proof)

Thorsten Altenkirch txa at Cs.Nott.AC.UK
Tue Sep 1 15:59:39 CEST 2009


It is sound but useless.

T.

On 1 Sep 2009, at 14:49, Edsko de Vries wrote:

> Hmm, well, perhaps it's obvious to you, but it's not obvious to me  
> that adding an inductive transitivity rule to an relation which is  
> probably transitive is not sound..
>
> -E
> _______________________________________________
> Agda mailing list
> Agda at lists.chalmers.se
> https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda


This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.



More information about the Agda mailing list