<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sergei Meshveliani <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mechvel@botik.ru" target="_blank">mechvel@botik.ru</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
But it needs 17 Gb heap to type-check. And I do not see any way to<br>
optimize my program any essentially.<br>
With GHC, I always find: how to optimize my program in a natural way.<br>
With Agda, I fail to find.<br><br>
I think that Agda is very good.<br>
And as it is really good, its type checker deserves to be optimized.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm absolutely not saying that Agda couldn't or shouldn't be optimised. I also agree completely that performance debugging Agda programs is hard, especially when it comes to type checking performance. What I'm trying to say is that I sometimes get the feeling (perhaps unfairly?) that people aren't even trying to optimise their programs because everybody knows that Agda is slow.</div><div><br></div><div>/ Ulf</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>