<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Is this restriction addressing the "termination checker + propositional univalence inconsistency" issue, or something else?<div><br></div><div>-Dan</div><div><br><div><div>On Jun 21, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Jesper Cockx <<a href="mailto:Jesper@sikanda.be">Jesper@sikanda.be</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>I suppose by 'people working on this issue', you mean Andreas and me? I'm not currently working on this problem, but I could be convinced to if the current hack turns out to be too inconvenient. However, I have two problems before I can start working on a fix:<br>
<br></div>- The current theory of pattern matching doesn't allow induction on 'deep' arguments, i.e. ones that only get an inductive type after pattern matching on some other arguments. So the theory would have to be extended.<br>
<br></div>- I don't have a lot of experience with the termination checker, so I'm not confident to mess with it. It seems that in order to fix this problem, the termination checker would need some type information, as well as information about the substitutions performed by the previous case splits.<br>
<br></div>If anyone can help me with (one of) these problems, I'd like to work together on it. Otherwise I'll try to get a better understanding by myself, but then it might take a long time.<br><br></div>Jesper<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Andrés Sicard-Ramírez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asr@eafit.edu.co" target="_blank">asr@eafit.edu.co</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">On 20 June 2014 09:07, Brent Yorgey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:byorgey@seas.upenn.edu" target="_blank">byorgey@seas.upenn.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow:hidden">but is the code I linked now expected to<br>
fail termination checking?</div></blockquote></div></div><br>Using the --without-K option? I don't know. This is an open issue and<br>people working on this issue know that the current behaviour is too<br>restrictive. I don't know if they are working in a better solution<br>
right now.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Andrés<br></div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Agda mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Agda@lists.chalmers.se">Agda@lists.chalmers.se</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda" target="_blank">https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>Agda mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Agda@lists.chalmers.se">Agda@lists.chalmers.se</a><br>https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>