There's an old ticket asking for this feature, but I don't think it's very high on the priority list. I'm sure people would appreciate a patch, though :)<div><br></div><div><a href="http://code.google.com/p/agda/issues/detail?id=78&start=100">http://code.google.com/p/agda/issues/detail?id=78&start=100</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mechvel@botik.ru" target="_blank">mechvel@botik.ru</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It is better to write<br>
<br>
f p@(prep2 x y xs x<=y ord-y-xs) = prep2 0 x (y :: xs) z<=n p<br>
<br>
than<br>
<br>
f (prep2 x y xs x<=y ord-y-xs) = prep2 0 x (y :: xs) z<=n<br>
(prep2 x y xs x<=y ord-y-xs)<br>
<br>
But Agda-2.3.0.1 reports "no @-patterns".<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
------<br>
Sergei<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Agda mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Agda@lists.chalmers.se">Agda@lists.chalmers.se</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda" target="_blank">https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>