From abela at chalmers.se Wed Jun 7 23:04:38 2017 From: abela at chalmers.se (Andreas Abel) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:04:38 +0200 Subject: [Agda-dev] Agda std-lib maintainer Message-ID: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> Hi Agda developers, I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the pull requests merged. It should someone with some genuine interest in the library, with a good taste, fairly conservative and responsible. The library should be developed in a backwards-compatible way, without big revolutions, but with continuity in mind. What do you think? Best, Andreas -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel at gu.se http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~abela/ From ulfn at chalmers.se Thu Jun 8 07:14:08 2017 From: ulfn at chalmers.se (Ulf Norell) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:14:08 +0200 Subject: [Agda-dev] Agda std-lib maintainer In-Reply-To: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> References: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> Message-ID: Absolutely. I nominate @MathewDaggit. / Ulf On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Andreas Abel wrote: > Hi Agda developers, > > I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the pull > requests merged. > > It should someone with some genuine interest in the library, with a good > taste, fairly conservative and responsible. > > The library should be developed in a backwards-compatible way, without big > revolutions, but with continuity in mind. > > What do you think? > > Best, > Andreas > > -- > Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. > > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden > > andreas.abel at gu.se > http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~abela/ > _______________________________________________ > Agda-dev mailing list > Agda-dev at lists.chalmers.se > https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From guillaume.allais at ens-lyon.org Thu Jun 8 09:53:12 2017 From: guillaume.allais at ens-lyon.org (G. Allais) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:53:12 +0200 Subject: [Agda-dev] Agda std-lib maintainer In-Reply-To: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> References: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> Message-ID: <8549fad8-28db-259a-3ccc-65c0639ffd4c@ens-lyon.org> > I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the > pull requests merged. Agreed. Aggressively designating reviewers and having a document spelling out the guidelines [1] might also speed up the process. Quite a lot of PRs are small enough that they can be reviewed in less than a quarter of an hour and they end up in limbo mostly because no one feels they have to / can say yes/no. [1] I'd assume: - Check it compiles with master (the travis builds are still broken) - Check it's backwards compatible (is the fact that the export list is a superset of the previous one sufficient?) - Naming conventions? On 07/06/17 23:04, Andreas Abel wrote: > Hi Agda developers, > > I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the > pull requests merged. > > It should someone with some genuine interest in the library, with a good > taste, fairly conservative and responsible. > > The library should be developed in a backwards-compatible way, without > big revolutions, but with continuity in mind. > > What do you think? > > Best, > Andreas > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From abela at chalmers.se Thu Jun 8 10:34:47 2017 From: abela at chalmers.se (Andreas Abel) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:34:47 +0200 Subject: [Agda-dev] Agda std-lib maintainer In-Reply-To: References: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> Message-ID: <9a8cf074-6897-314f-a69c-b451c373e433@chalmers.se> I also think we should ask him. On 08.06.2017 07:14, Ulf Norell wrote: > Absolutely. I nominate @MathewDaggit. > > / Ulf > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Andreas Abel > wrote: > > Hi Agda developers, > > I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the > pull requests merged. > > It should someone with some genuine interest in the library, with a > good taste, fairly conservative and responsible. > > The library should be developed in a backwards-compatible way, > without big revolutions, but with continuity in mind. > > What do you think? > > Best, > Andreas > > -- > Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. > > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden > > andreas.abel at gu.se > http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~abela/ > _______________________________________________ > Agda-dev mailing list > Agda-dev at lists.chalmers.se > https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda-dev > > > -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel at gu.se http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~abela/ From abela at chalmers.se Thu Jun 8 10:37:58 2017 From: abela at chalmers.se (Andreas Abel) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:37:58 +0200 Subject: [Agda-dev] Agda std-lib maintainer In-Reply-To: <8549fad8-28db-259a-3ccc-65c0639ffd4c@ens-lyon.org> References: <0efe7fb1-69ac-ab77-d0a3-5dbf5c0d6599@chalmers.se> <8549fad8-28db-259a-3ccc-65c0639ffd4c@ens-lyon.org> Message-ID: <04a512ea-670f-76fc-7b8e-2a9b4d534d0c@chalmers.se> Wrt to the naming convertions, I suggest: * uppercase camel-case for modules and types * lowercase camel-case for functions * lowercase separate-with-dashes for proofs Mimic the current style of the library. Try to reuse analogous names from the Haskell world as much as possible. On 08.06.2017 09:53, G. Allais wrote: >> I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the >> pull requests merged. > > Agreed. Aggressively designating reviewers and having a document > spelling out the guidelines [1] might also speed up the process. > Quite a lot of PRs are small enough that they can be reviewed in > less than a quarter of an hour and they end up in limbo mostly > because no one feels they have to / can say yes/no. > > [1] I'd assume: > - Check it compiles with master (the travis builds are still broken) > - Check it's backwards compatible (is the fact that the > export list is a superset of the previous one sufficient?) > - Naming conventions? > > > > On 07/06/17 23:04, Andreas Abel wrote: >> Hi Agda developers, >> >> I think we should designate a maintainer for the std-lib, to get the >> pull requests merged. >> >> It should someone with some genuine interest in the library, with a good >> taste, fairly conservative and responsible. >> >> The library should be developed in a backwards-compatible way, without >> big revolutions, but with continuity in mind. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Best, >> Andreas >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Agda-dev mailing list > Agda-dev at lists.chalmers.se > https://lists.chalmers.se/mailman/listinfo/agda-dev > -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel at gu.se http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~abela/